![]() |
| Peter Conradi's The Great Survivors |
I think it’s not really a secret that, even though I’m not a monarchist, I am fascinated by monarchy. Part of it is that I don’t live in a country with a hereditary head of state, and so the concept is somewhat exotic to me; part of it is that the average monarch comes with a whole bunch of sparkle and glitter, and I'm a well-documented magpie. So when Peter Conradi sent me a copy of his new book, The Great Survivors: How Monarchy Made It into the Twenty-First Century, I was excited to read and review it. (There was another reason for this excitement, too – I’ll get there in a minute.)
Conradi is a journalist and the co-author of the tie-in book for the fabulous recent film about George VI, The King’s Speech. But this book isn’t a memoir or a biography, exactly – it’s more of an examination of the concept of monarchy and an exploration of how in the world the remaining monarchies have managed to survive all of the upheavals of the past 300 years. There’s a good bit of history here, especially of those monarchies that have rested precariously close to the edge of abolishment (or, in some cases, like that of Spain, have fallen over that edge but managed to recover). And, of course, there’s a good bit of political discussion – how monarchies function, what they do, how they compare with other systems.
But for a royal blogger who is quite upfront about her sometimes less-than-academic approach to the subject, the part of the book that really sucked me in was, well, the gossip. Some of the biggest obstacles that surviving monarchies have had to hurdle are the personal ones – illegitimate children, marriages in crisis, potential spouses who are deemed unsuitable, etc., etc. Conradi looks at the reigning monarch and heir of each of Europe’s current monarchies, as well as their families.
We meet King Albert of Belgium’s daughter, Delphine Boel, whose birth nearly ended his marriage with Queen Paola. We chart the dramatic and sometimes traumatic life of King Juan Carlos of Spain, from his family’s tormented relationship with Franco and the accidental shooting that killed his brother to the romances he had before his marriage and the negotiations that linked the royal houses of Greece and Spain. We hear the stories of Princesses Mette-Marit, Maxima, and Letizia’s eventual acceptance as future queens, even if their personal histories included a few skeletons. And it’s an utterly delightful journey; gossipy, yes, but with a purpose -- in an era when the public can in some places and cases vote a monarchy out of existence, even a tabloid story can sometimes rock the institution to its core.
That said, there are a few places that the book sometimes falters. One, I thought, was in the organization of the material – Conradi’s dealing with a massive subject, and sometimes I wasn’t sure exactly why he arranged the chapters of the book in the order that he did. There didn’t seem to be an overarching argument in those terms. Other than that, it’s mostly in the details. Occasionally the author mixes up the many queens of The Netherlands or assigns the wrong parent to a royal child. But neither of those things took away from my overall enjoyment of the book.
But I must include a caveat, because part of my enjoyment was my hunt for my own name in the book. Conradi includes a section on how royalty has become a major topic of discussion online, and he highlights a few blogs and bloggers. I’m among them, and I knew I was included before I started reading the book, but I think I would have enjoyed it as much as I did even without that little cherry atop the sundae. Not shockingly, Mad Hattery is featured in the book as one of the “oddest” royal blogs on the ‘net – I’ve been asked if I was offended by such a categorization. I can only say this: have all of you read Mad Hattery? It is excessively odd – but I think it’s odd in a wonderful way. So, no, I wasn’t offended at all; I was immensely flattered to be included.
Long story short: two big thumbs up from this non-monarchist royal blogger. Although I was given my copy, this is a book I would definitely purchase to read. The book's release date is two weeks from today, on June 15; you can pre-order it here at Amazon. But, even better, one of you won’t have to spend money to get a copy of the book! Conradi and his publishers are offering a signed copy of the book to one lucky reader of this blog.
Entering the giveaway is simple: just comment on this post with one reason that you think monarchies have survived into the twenty-first century. (One comment per reader, please!) You have until Friday, June 15, 2012, at 5:00 PM Eastern time (that’s New York time) to comment. The giveaway is open to readers worldwide.
One lucky winner will be chosen at random to win the book -- I will announce the winner on Saturday, June 16th, so please check back then to see if you're that lucky person!

Loved the book too, nice review and congratulations on the mention! :)
ReplyDeleteThanks, Marilyn! :)
DeleteI just found your blog via your twitter/other royal blogs! I think monarchies have survived because they seem to be the one unifying factor of the country and many countries (European and others) can trace their history back through their royal families and it seems like a very hard thing to get rid of or even forget as time goes by.
ReplyDeleteLove your blogs! I don't know why monarchies survive, but I'm sure glad they have because I love following their comings and goings! Thanks for a chance to win what looks like an interesting read!
ReplyDeleteHello!
ReplyDeleteI think monarchies have survived because the political process of most modern democracies works on a rotating basis which does not lend itself to establishing and maintaining a national identity. Monarchies provide a stable “family model” lens, however functional or dysfunctional, for their people to identify with, emulate, reject, and/or mock. Furthermore, most monarchies, to their credit, have put themselves to work as Public Relations Volunteers whose primary function is to raise the profile and bottom line for their country’s non-profits (i.e. charities) in addition to lending themselves out as ambassadors to improve relations with other nations.
I would very much love to read Mr. Conradi’s thoughts on the topic!
"One reason that you think monarchies have survived into the twenty-first century."
ReplyDeletePoliticians (presidents and prime ministers) come and go, but the monarchies stay stead fast and carry on year after year. They are symbols of patriotism that people look to in times of great joy, triumph, sadness and even loss. They weave themselves into the fabric of their people's lives, and their people do the same weaving the royal families into their own.
By the way, congratulations on the shout out in the book. That is so over-the-top-awesome!!!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Annie! :)
DeleteAwesome - even though I'd probably get more hung up than you on the name mix-ups, but I'm an editing nazi like that.
ReplyDeleteIn addition to these other great answers, I think monarchy has survived to the 21st century because it can bring a sense of awe and wonder that a republic just can't muster. I've been to Washington, DC, and while it's is a great city, it just can't project that same sense of majesty that a visit to London's royal sites must hold. This shall-we-call-it-magic would undoubtedly be dimmed if the monarchy were to be dismantled.
I enjoyed following you on Twitter during the Jubilee flotilla. The Queen looks radiant and happy. And, dare I say, cute.
ReplyDeleteThanks, cupcake! For those who don't yet follow me on Twitter, I'm there at @royaltywithella.
DeleteMy opinion of why people like monarchies ... they provide a symbol of patriotism and tradition. There must be something very satisfying about knowing that one's country will always have some sort of constant figurehead, and subjects typically know years ahead of time who will eventually be their new monarch.
ReplyDeleteI think the tradition of it all brings comfort to most people in a world that is constantly changing.
ReplyDeleteTheresa N
weceno(at)yahoo(dot)com
Oooh, this book sounds great!
ReplyDeleteI think that monarchies have survived because people like tradition. They like the thought of a little bit of consistency in a political world that has hardly any consistency in it. At least, that's why I like the monarchy! Also, who doesn't like a little bit of pomp and circumstance every once in a while?!
Congrats on the mention, too! And Mad Hattery isn't odd in a bad way- it's odd in a fabulous way!
The book sounds very interesting! I think monarchies have survived in this century because they work for the betterment of the people and generally try to stay out of politics. People know that their royal family will be with them through thick and thin (and not out of office in 4 - 8 years).
ReplyDeleteI think the monarchies have survived because they offer a glimpse of glamour most of us never come close to experiencing in our daily lives. Not even our proms and wedding come close! And I think even the most down-to-earth woman can dream about wearing an expensive gown, tiara, and priceless jewelry, and having a title.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the book recommendation!
People are fascinated with monarchies because they are an escape. They are not worrying about jobs and bills and our modern lives but take us back to when fairy tales existed and princes saved the princess from dragons. Regardless of it is a 21st century Prince wedding his Princess or a strong 16th century Queen defending her homeland, it is a world of glamour and chivalry that does not exist to most of us anymore.
ReplyDeleteI think monarchies have survived because their power has been decreased and they're no longer the threat or as oppressive as they had been in the past. Now it's more a beloved tradition and I don't think anyone is looking to behead their queen!
ReplyDeleteA kingship/queenship is the ultimate unattainable prize ... people love unattainability and all of its sparkle (lol). It's also the ultimate form of entertainment watching the pomp and splendor of their pageants and walkabouts!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the review and the giveaway!
shanahattis at gmail dot com
I believe Monarchies have survived into the modern age because people really do love an ideal; having someone powerful, beautiful and wealthy to represent them unconditionally.
ReplyDeletePart of the reason why Monarchies have survived is tradition and the reluctance to bring about major change as when some have taken action it hasn't exactly been clean-cut, also many monarchies have skillfully adapted to fit a modern era and represent the new generation of people. People like a Monarchy because they know were they are with them, they know who will be the next king/queen and they know they will (hopefully!) be trained properly for the job since birth.
ReplyDeleteI personally read about Monarchies as escapism and I don't think I'm alone!
ReplyDeletePersonally, I think Monarchies continue to survive because of the citizens of the country. They choose to let these monarchs survive and carry on the tradition that has been there ever since. Perhaps the reason why people relate or identify with the continued existence of these monarchy is because of the symbolism, history, meaning and importance they have in that country which is different from other countries.
ReplyDeleteMonarchies have survived because they are above politics. Most monarchs today are admired and respected – and in some cases, even loved!
ReplyDeleteWe love the crowns and the gowns, the titles and tiaras, the princesses and the palaces. We celebrate with them; we grieve with them and for them and we appreciate the role they carry out on our behalf. On a more serious note, they connect us to our history, tradition and pageantry.
And may I add, in this Jubilee Year in the United Kingdom – Long Live our Queen!
Monarchies have survived because the were able to adapt themselves to modern times. From being totalic rulers they transformed to a far more representative role. They are also representative of history, which comes with a lot of responsability, but it also unifies people.
ReplyDeleteOne reason the monarchy has survived is the yin-and-yang need of humans to have something to venerate and criticize at the same time. Even avowed fans of a monarchy feel free to nitpick their royal family's choices of schools, fashion, vacations, and mates. I think it has something to do with those words "OUR royal FAMILY."
ReplyDeleteMonarchies have survived because tradition is hard to abandon. Figureheads are iconic - the most modern interpretation of a mascot. Monarchies also embody nationalism and national pride thus making it a difficult task to abolish a monarchy.
ReplyDeleteI can only speak for my country, Belgium, as I say that the monarchy has played a crucial part in the existence of the nation. It is, in a sense, a neutral ground in a very heavily divided country. An apolitical resting place in times of political turmoil. The monarchy also represents a noble idea of internationalism and cosmopolitanism.
ReplyDeletePlus, I firmly believe that if the world had more heads of state like Daisy, it would be a much better place.
I think these monarchies have survived because throughout history they have showed the 'less privileged' that the royals too are people. They have turned monarchy into a mirror in the sense that even though the royals are on top of everyone when the normal people look at royals they see other people (the royals) looking back at them and giving them the respect they are entitled to. It can be clearly seen that countries which had monarchs that showed the people that they are better than them and treated them and made them feel like filthy animals are today republics.
ReplyDeleteI think monarchies have survived for a combination of reasons. They unite the people in times of national sadness and in times of celebration. They are representative of traditional values and the history and grandeur of a country's past. While being pillars of tradition, they have been able to stay the course and adapt to a changing society. The monarchies that fell during World War I, such as the Austrian dual monarchy and the Russian empire, failed to live up to the changing attitudes and ideas that developed in the years prior to the war while the other, Britain in particular, were able to ride the wave and become even more popular.
ReplyDeleteCongrats on the mention! I recently discovered Mad Hattery--it's great!
ReplyDeletePerhaps monarchies survive because religion is dying yet people still feel an urge to put someone on a pedestal. And the soap opera aspects are fun!
I think the monarchies survive because they're an unbroken link between the past and the present - linking the generations. And because they're a constant in an ever-changing world. I mean that in a positive way.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the chance to win Ella! I think, as others have said, that monarchies have survived because they have been able to adapt to changing times. People thought they were out of touch, so George V started going on walkabouts. London was being bombed all over and while the princesses were sent to safety, George VI and Queen Elizabeth stayed. QEII agreed to have her Coronation televised and many people bought televisions just for the occasion. And on and on... And because they're great fun to watch and speculate about :-D
ReplyDeleteInteresting book-I think monarchies that have survived have done so by adapting to the social changes around them and keeping themselves relevant to the needs of their people.
ReplyDeleteThe Monarchies are my guilty pleaser :) I find they give a country a level of stability and identity. And good monarchs are like parents looking out for the welfare of the country and its people, promoting there country and its people. I think the people of these countries see this and aren't wiling to let it go.
ReplyDeleteThanks for offering this contest! I think the monarchies that have survived managed to keep themselves relevant to their people, both culturally and by giving kind of a "fall back" for the government (like, the people can get REALLY angry with the government, instead of the royals). Thanks again for the contest and I hope I win!
ReplyDeleteI too think those that have survived have done so because of adapting, and having a more personal approach and contact with their people.
ReplyDeleteElla if I don't win, I will buy the book based on your review. The Queens' Diamonds from the Royal Collection arrived yesterday...wonderful for the magpies among us.
ReplyDeleteRoyal Families survive because we need someone to look up to. Witness we Americans and our need to idolize political families (Kennedys, Bushs, etc.) and celebrities. How much better is it to have a family who has no axe (thinking of the British Royal Family) to grind in terms of politics and political advancement? Their axe to grind is only working for the best for Britain. The icing on the cake of course is the glamour that accompanies royal families. We love all of the pictures of jewelry and clothes and we want these people to be happy and responsible in their lives. They symbolize their countries and ideally represent them well.
People like traditions and symbols and monarchies in today's society excel at those functions or they perish.
ReplyDeleteI believe the most important reason is tradition. People admire and appreciate things that seem steady and safe. Monarchs have also adapted themselves to the current times and have brought themselves closer to the people.
ReplyDeleteI think constitutional monarchy is very beneficial to society & democracy and it will/should survive because: it provides continuity & stability, it is above politics, it celebrates a country's history & tradition, it represents the nation and gives a more human face to the state.
ReplyDeleteI think the monarchies have survived for a number of reasons. Firstly, they know the value of PR and spin control, as well as "being seen" frequently enough that they cannot be forgotten. Secondly, I think many people need a tradition to cling to, especially when life gets a little tough. Thirdly, I think there is a little princess, prince, king, queen, duke, etc. in all of us. It is the fairy tale that came true, not for us, but for someone beautiful, handsome, stately, dignified, etc. Fourth, monarchies give us grounding, patriotism, example, and a running soap opera (whether good or naughty). Monarchies, in and of themselves, provide comic relief. Fifth, it would, in many cases, be difficult to dispose of a monarchy. The headaches involved in who owns what, what the state owns, what the monarchy owns and what individuals own is just too mind boggling. It is just easier to keep the monarchy in place rather than going through the headache of breaking it up. And, finally, there is the tourism benefit. Many people like to go to a country in hopes of seeing a member of the monarchy, their home/castle/palace, and anything remotely related to monarchy. Oh, and, P.S. monarchies keep us on our computers way too long each day!
ReplyDeleteI think that perhaps the monarchies have survived largely due to the fact that people love traditions, and no one can do traditions better than the monarchs!
ReplyDeleteI think monarchies have survived because it's really unifying for a nation to have a head of state outside of politics, and because everyone loves a little bling!
ReplyDeleteThanks for entering the contest, everyone! The giveaway is now closed; I will choose a winner randomly from the comments on the survival of monarchy and announce the winner in the next few days!
ReplyDeleteWho wins, who wins???
ReplyDeleteWhen will we know who the winner is please?
ReplyDeleteAnn -- the winner was announced several days ago; see the post above this one!
DeleteElla, just wanted to say thank you for providing a forum for all of us with RWEK Discussion, we had loads of fun! I'm sorry it's not continuing, but hopefully we'll all find each other in another forum. All the best and I'll still be checking in here and at Mad Hattery!
ReplyDelete